"Evolution is not science, it's a religion. It takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in creation."
Kent Hovind, Creation Seminar Series, Part 1 January 2003 Watch clip ↗

What the evidence says

Evolution is supported by over 150 years of evidence across genetics, paleontology, comparative anatomy, and direct observation. It makes testable predictions, is falsifiable, and is accepted by 97% of scientists. Religion requires faith in unfalsifiable claims — the exact opposite of the scientific method.

The claim that evolution is a “religion” conflates two fundamentally different epistemological frameworks:

Science relies on observable evidence, testable hypotheses, peer review, and the willingness to revise conclusions when new evidence emerges. Evolution meets all of these criteria.

Religion relies on faith — belief without or beyond empirical evidence. Faith is considered a virtue in religious contexts precisely because it does not require proof.

Calling evolution a religion is a rhetorical strategy designed to place scientific evidence on the same epistemological footing as religious belief, thereby suggesting both are equally valid “worldviews.” This is the false equivalence fallacy.

The scientific consensus on evolution is comparable to the consensus on heliocentrism or germ theory. A 2015 Pew Research survey found that 98% of AAAS scientists accept that humans evolved over time.